Bottom | Table of Contents | Index to Key Themes | Burning Coal | New Wine Online |
back | next |
Having answered Bildad's interruption, Job returns to his discourse on God's season for punishment of the wicked of chapter twenty-four. He is becoming steadily more intense, “while my breath is in me, and the spirit of God is in my nostrils; my lips shall not speak wickedness” (27:2-4). With all that Satan has thrown against him, Job remains resolute in his respect for God. Satan is trying to drive him away from God. For a time, Job was becoming despondent and self-focused. But the harder the devil drives at him, the more Job looks to God.
Job is getting stronger, his vision getting clearer rather than weaker. "God forbid that I should justify you" (27:5), Job points his argument at his accusers, “My righteousness I hold fast” (27:6). His friends are challenging Job to confess to sins he has not committed. To satisfy you, Job implies, I would have to create a sin. I won't do that. He rightly refuses to budge in spite of the disdain of his friends. If God is righteous, He will not condemn without cause.
Job is in an odd bind, he is under the heavy hand of God, but he knows of no sin for which he should be condemned. In chapter 31 he will make an ‘oath of clearing’, in essence challenging God to look upon his righteousness. God will rebuke him for his rashness. The fact that Job's ways are perfect does not make him perfect heart and soul, but he can't see that as yet. “But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags” (Isa. 64:6). Job is being called to see the condition of his heart. The hand of God is maturing Job.
Job pronounces a curse on his accusers: “Let mine enemy be as the wicked” (27:7). Earlier he refrained from reciprocating when Zophar cursed him (11:5). Job has had enough. There can be no mistaking that Job is speaking of his friends. The word translated here as ‘hypocrite’ means “soiled (that is, with sin), impious” (Strong, H2611). “For what is the hope of the hypocrite... when God taketh away his soul” (27:8)? Be it here or there, there is judgment for the wicked.
When the hypocrite is suffering as I am suffering, Job points his argument directly at his friends, “Will he delight himself in the Almighty? will he always call upon God” (27:10)? This question implies a self-righteous gloating, which Job will condemn: “If I rejoice at the destruction of him that hated me, or lifted up myself when evil found him...” (31:29). Job is very real. He has his good moments and his not so good moments. For the most part, Job displays the patience of a saint.
“I will teach you by the hand of God” (27:11), Job goes on, “ye yourselves have seen it, why then are ye thus altogether vain?” (27:12). “The original is very emphatical: hebel tehbalu, and well expressed by Mr. Good: ‘Why then should ye thus babble babblings!’ If our language would allow it, we might say vanitize vanity” (Clarke, note on 27:12). “The rich man shall lie down, but he shall not be gathered” (27:19). Gold and silver are not indicators of righteousness (27:16-19), Job penetrates Bildad's self-righteousness defense. “For God shall cast upon him, and not spare” (27:22), and then those who looked up to the rich man will turn on him: “Men shall clap their hands at him, and shall hiss him out of his place” (27:23). Job's theology on judgment beyond the grave is continuing to develop. Here he suggests that the evil man, though he be rich, will not be ‘gathered’ [unto God], but the ‘east wind’, the hot desert storms will hurl him out and God will ‘cast’ or hurl Himself upon the wretched soul. “For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?” (Matt. 16:26).
The contention is becoming intense. One of the friends lists the punishment of the wicked, while staring at Job, and now Job is listing the punishment of the wicked, while staring at them. Far from comfort, the two drawn sides are ratcheting up judgment against the other. Some scholars contend that 27:7-23 is a fragment of a lost speech (Zophar's third presumably). “It is virtually impossible to ascribe 27:7-23 to Job” (New Concise Bible Dictionary, 276). I suppose that the thought is that Job would never condemn his friends as they have condemned him. As we have no way to know for sure, outside of the unearthing of a new manuscript, this must remain an interesting supposition. I have no difficulty assigning the speech to Job. And I rather like the contrast of viewpoints concerning the place of gold.
back | next |
Top | Table of Contents | Index to Key Themes | Burning Coal | New Wine Online |